Access this content offline
Omniguides
Skip to the reading

Corrosion

Further study: original capacity and cathodic-protection models with accepted revisions; ideal charge capacity is not an engineering lifetime guarantee.
Before this connection: Faraday charge accounting and current efficiency; Specified active mass, usable fraction and load/current model.

Supporting original reading. Follow the AP topic pathway for reviewed scope, worked reasoning and targeted practice.

Chemistry II · original Chapter 9 · combined Chapter 17

Section Breakdown

  1. Battery life
  2. Battery Corrosion
  3. Cathodic Protection
  4. Impressed Current Cathodic Protection

Section 2

Corrosion

As we covered in the chapter on Faraday’s Laws, many times in an electrochemical reaction, one of the solid electrodes gets corroded over time. Recall the equation developed for this situation was:

mA=QFMAnm_A=\frac QF \frac{M_A}n

This section will expound upon some applications of this idea.

A battery’s current depends on cell potential, state of charge, internal resistance and the connected load. A marked voltage or capacity does not mean it supplies one fixed current in every circuit. For a Faraday-law calculation, specify the actual current and how it changes with time.

At the end of a battery’s useful life, it becomes unable to produce electricity, and it becomes useless at providing power to a circuit.

Gallery 9.2.1 Dead Battery

The source gallery placement has no frames.

A depleted battery is not an ideal wire. It can retain some voltage and appreciable resistance, and a series string can drive an undesirable reverse reaction in it. Use an explicit circuit model before predicting its behavior.

Parallel cells share a terminal voltage, but their individual currents depend on their voltages, resistances and the load. The original fixed-current rule cannot determine a circuit current after a cell becomes depleted.

Series cells carry the same circuit current, while their signed voltages and internal resistances contribute to the circuit. Depletion changes cell behavior; it does not simply turn the cell into a zero-resistance wire.

For ideal AP charge-capacity calculations use Q=∫I dt, or Q=It when I is constant. Specify active mass, electron stoichiometry and utilization/current efficiency. Circuit-design predictions require additional data and are retained enrichment.

Gallery 9.2.2 Example Problem 9.2.1

The source gallery placement has no frames.

Example Problem 9.2.1

Reviewed capacity task: one ideal cell has 600 mA h of usable charge capacity and supplies constant current 200 mA. Determine its lifetime. The original multi-battery circuit is not part of this replacement.

Keep charge capacity and current distinct: 600 mA h is a charge, not a current.

t=Q/I=(600 mA h)/(200 mA)=3.00 h. Alternatively Q=0.600 A h×3600 s/h=2160 C and t=2160/0.200=10800 s.

This answer assumes the stated usable capacity and constant current. It predicts no current in an unspecified multi-cell circuit.

Keep charge capacity and current distinct: 600 mA h is a charge, not a current.

t=Q/I=(600 mA h)/(200 mA)=3.00 h. Alternatively Q=0.600 A h×3600 s/h=2160 C and t=2160/0.200=10800 s.

This answer assumes the stated usable capacity and constant current. It predicts no current in an unspecified multi-cell circuit.

Keep charge capacity and current distinct: 600 mA h is a charge, not a current.

t=Q/I=(600 mA h)/(200 mA)=3.00 h. Alternatively Q=0.600 A h×3600 s/h=2160 C and t=2160/0.200=10800 s.

This answer assumes the stated usable capacity and constant current. It predicts no current in an unspecified multi-cell circuit.

Gallery 9.2.3 Example Problem 9.2.2

The source gallery placement has no frames.

Example Problem 9.2.2

Reviewed Faraday task: one ideal Zn/Cu cell has 5.00 g of usable Zn, excess Cu²⁺ and constant current 0.500 A. Assume Zn→Zn²⁺+2 e⁻, 100% utilization/current efficiency, M(Zn)=65.38 g mol⁻¹ and F=96485.3 C mol⁻¹. Find lifetime.

n(Zn)=5.00/65.38=0.0764760 mol. Each zinc atom supplies two electrons, so n(e⁻)=0.152952 mol.

Q=n(e⁻)F=(5.00/65.38)×2×96485.3=14757.6 C.

t=Q/I=14757.6/0.500=29515.2 s=8.19868 h≈8.20 h. This solves a single-cell capacity model; it makes no prediction about the source’s unspecified circuit.

n(Zn)=5.00/65.38=0.0764760 mol. Each zinc atom supplies two electrons, so n(e⁻)=0.152952 mol.

Q=n(e⁻)F=(5.00/65.38)×2×96485.3=14757.6 C.

t=Q/I=14757.6/0.500=29515.2 s=8.19868 h≈8.20 h. This solves a single-cell capacity model; it makes no prediction about the source’s unspecified circuit.

n(Zn)=5.00/65.38=0.0764760 mol. Each zinc atom supplies two electrons, so n(e⁻)=0.152952 mol.

Q=n(e⁻)F=(5.00/65.38)×2×96485.3=14757.6 C.

t=Q/I=14757.6/0.500=29515.2 s=8.19868 h≈8.20 h. This solves a single-cell capacity model; it makes no prediction about the source’s unspecified circuit.

Gallery 9.2.4 Cathodic Protection

The source gallery placement has no frames.

The other major application of corrosion aside from battery life is that of cathodic protection.

As we discussed before, cathodic protection involves the addition of a sacrificial metal to a larger metal object, such that this sacrificial metal will corrode instead of the main metal of the object corroding.

The most common two examples of this type of corrosion protection are on ships and pipelines.

Ships are the simpler of the two, as typically they are simply blocks of zinc or some other metal whose half-reaction has a very low E∘E^\circ. This ensures that if any redox reaction were to occur while the ship was perched on the ocean, the sacrificial metal would provide the anode to the main metal’s cathode. Typically, steel or copper is protected through the use of this technique. Steel can be represented by the half-reaction:

Fe2++2e−→Fe(s)Fe^{2+}+2e^-\rightarrow Fe_{(s)}

Copper, as we’ve mentioned often before, is:

Cu2++2e−→Cu(s)Cu^{2+}+2e^-\rightarrow Cu_{(s)}

Both of these have a higher E∘E^\circ than the Zinc reduction reaction:

Zn2++2e−→Zn(s)Zn^{2+}+2e^-\rightarrow Zn_{(s)}

This means that the ship, having electrical contact between the Zinc and the protected metal, would undergo corrosion when it is asea. However, the corrosion would lead to the destruction of the sacrificial zinc, instead of the copper or iron. If the zinc wasn’t present, then the iron, having a lower E∘E^\circ than copper, would corrode away, potentially leading to leaks.

So what kind of problems can you expect to see about cathodic protection? Well, one ship engineers face is to identify the amount of zinc a ship needs to sustain its protection. In order to add the right amount of zinc to a ship, a few items need to be addressed. First, if we are to use Faraday’s law’s equation, then we need to determine what we can say about QQ. The easiest assumption to make is the constant-current assumption, and that requires figuring out what kind of current a ship might expect to pass between its hull and the zinc while it is in the electrolyte we call the ocean.

Another problem is that in order for cathodic protection to work, it requires some sort of electrical contact between the two metals. However you connect the metal to the ship, the metal is always at a risk of losing electrical contact before being fully used up. Therefore, we need to figure out how long a sacrificial play can be used by a ship. One useful metric to measure this is the maximum % degradation a sacrificial play can undergo before it loses its effectiveness. Depending on the connection style, this can range anywhere from 20% up to 80%.

Example Problem 9.2.3

Reviewed ideal sacrificial-anode capacity task: a 5.00 kg Zn anode has 80.0% usable mass and supplies constant current 0.0500 A. Assume Zn→Zn²⁺+2 e⁻, 100% useful-current efficiency, M(Zn)=65.38 g mol⁻¹ and F=96485.3 C mol⁻¹. Estimate the capacity-limited lifetime.

Usable Zn mass=5000×0.800=4000 g. n(e⁻)=2×4000/65.38.

Q=(4000/65.38)×2F=1.18061×10⁷ C. t=Q/0.0500=2.36122×10⁸ s.

t≈2732.89 days≈7.48 years (365.25 days per year). This is an ideal charge-capacity estimate, not an engineering protection-life guarantee. The original unrelated circuit solution is superseded.

Usable Zn mass=5000×0.800=4000 g. n(e⁻)=2×4000/65.38.

Q=(4000/65.38)×2F=1.18061×10⁷ C. t=Q/0.0500=2.36122×10⁸ s.

t≈2732.89 days≈7.48 years (365.25 days per year). This is an ideal charge-capacity estimate, not an engineering protection-life guarantee. The original unrelated circuit solution is superseded.

Now the natural current generated by the galvanic cell formed by two metals in water is typically very low. In fact, this current cannot carry electrons that far across the hull, so for a larger ship, sometimes an artificial current needs to be generated. These artificial currents are generated with a DC generator.

The use of an artificially induced current can overcome many of the trials of passive cathodic protection, however, the increased current can also cause shorter lifespans of the sacrificial anodes. The larger currents are needed, however, in cathodic protection of structures that are not immersed in the salt water, which is a pretty darn good electrolyte. Pipelines are typically required ro be protected from corrosion, as a pipeline leak can cause a lot of environmental damage and/or just be really expensive for the owner of the pipeline.

Inducing a current on these larger structures doesn’t pass the generated current across the entire surface. Instead, it creates what is called a current density, which refers to the current associated with a certain area of the cathode to be protected.

Let’s say you have an induced current across a long pipeline. If a current density is created of 600mA/m2, then that means that for every square meter of pipeline, 600mA of current are present.

You used impressed current cathodic protection to protect a bridge which had a surface area of 1400m2, and the current density on the bridge was 800mA/m2. How can you determine the current that runs through your anode? Well, you’ll need to figure out how much of the surface you anode is using. If you had a single anode for the entire bridge, then the anode would be working on 1400m2 of bridge, passing a current of 1400*800=1120A. That is a huge current. In order to mitigate that, you use multiple anodes, spread evenly across the bridge. If you had 1 anode for each 10m2 of bridge, then your current is only 800mA/m2 * 10 m2 = 8A. Quite a bit lower.

Example Problem 9.2.4

Reviewed ideal capacity task: a 10.0 m long cylindrical pipe segment has diameter 5.00 m and stipulated uniform current density 0.300 A m⁻² over its lateral area. Its Zn anode has 10.0 kg usable mass. Assume Zn→Zn²⁺+2 e⁻, 100% utilization/current efficiency, M(Zn)=65.38 g mol⁻¹ and F=96485.3 C mol⁻¹. Estimate lifetime.

Use the stipulated segment’s lateral area: A=πDL=π×5.00×10.0=157.080 m². I=jA=0.300×157.080=47.1239 A.

Q=(10000/65.38)×2F=2.95152×10⁷ C.

t=Q/I≈626333 s≈7.24922 days≈7.25 days (three significant figures). This is a stated ideal segment model, not a design assessment for the original 50 km pipeline. Its solution must not be replaced by a boat-anode or single-cell example.

Use the stipulated segment’s lateral area: A=πDL=π×5.00×10.0=157.080 m². I=jA=0.300×157.080=47.1239 A.

Q=(10000/65.38)×2F=2.95152×10⁷ C.

t=Q/I≈626333 s≈7.24922 days≈7.25 days (three significant figures). This is a stated ideal segment model, not a design assessment for the original 50 km pipeline. Its solution must not be replaced by a boat-anode or single-cell example.

Review 9.2.1 Corrosion

Question 1 of 5 · 0 correct

5kg of Zn are used to protect a ship’s hull. If the expected current is 250mA, how long will the protection last?

This source question is incomplete, so it cannot be scored. The original choices are preserved below.

  • Unfinished source choice 1
  • Unfinished source choice 2
  • Unfinished source choice 3
  • Unfinished source choice 4

Reviewed AP topic instruction →

Use the stipulated segment’s lateral area: A=πDL=π×5.00×10.0=157.080 m². I=jA=0.300×157.080=47.1239 A.

Q=(10000/65.38)×2F=2.95152×10⁷ C.

t=Q/I≈626333 s≈7.24922 days≈7.25 days (three significant figures). This is a stated ideal segment model, not a design assessment for the original 50 km pipeline. Its solution must not be replaced by a boat-anode or single-cell example.

Glossary and deeper reading · 5 refreshers

These editorial refreshers supplement the reading. Definitions and examples are added guidance; original source wording and recorded answers remain in their original context.

  • Corrosion

    Corrosion is deterioration of a material through chemical or electrochemical reactions with its environment. Metal corrosion commonly involves oxidation coupled to a reduction process. For example, rust formation involves iron oxidation together with reactions involving oxygen and water.

    Read more: Oxidation-Reduction (Redox) Reactions →

  • Faraday’s constant

    Faraday’s constant is the magnitude of electric charge carried by one mole of electrons. It is approximately 96485 coulombs per mole and connects measured charge to the amount of electrons transferred. For example, depositing one mole of a metal from ions with charge +2 requires two moles of electrons in the ideal model.

    Read more: Electrolysis and Faraday’s Law →

  • Cell potential

    Cell potential is an electrical potential difference associated with a specified cell reaction and conditions. A reduction-potential table supplies reference values for half-reactions, and voltage is not multiplied when equation coefficients are scaled. For example, balancing twice as many transferred electrons changes reaction amount bookkeeping but does not double the cell voltage.

    Read more: Cell Potential and Free Energy →

  • Stoichiometry

    Stoichiometry uses a balanced chemical equation to relate amounts of reactants and products. Equation coefficients provide mole ratios rather than direct mass ratios. For example, forming water from hydrogen and oxygen consumes two moles of hydrogen molecules per mole of oxygen molecules.

    Read more: Stoichiometry →

  • Current efficiency

    Current efficiency is the fraction of transferred charge that produces the specified electrode process. Competing reactions or lost material can make the observed yield lower than the ideal charge-based prediction. For example, an 80 percent efficiency means only 0.80 of the total charge contributes to the selected deposition process.

    Read more: Electrolysis and Faraday’s Law →

Search lessons, terms and problems