Access this content offline
Omniguides
Skip to the reading

Chapter 3 Solutions

Worked solutions to all thirty problems, with the reason for each step. These explanations were added for this edition; the chapter answer key and original worked examples follow below.

Chapter problems → · Chapter answer key → · Original worked examples →

Problem 1

Original problem · added worked solution

Find the slope of the tangent line at x = –1 of the piecewise function:​
f(x)={x2+1pifx<1-x+2pifx>1

Authored worked explanation for the original source problem.

  1. At x=−1, nearby inputs lie in the branch f(x)=x2+1 because −1<1.

    Why: The remote branch at x>1 does not affect this local slope.

  2. Differentiate to get f′(x)=2x and substitute −1 to get −2.

    Why: The polynomial power rule applies in this neighborhood.

Reviewed answer: -2

Takeaway: A piecewise derivative uses the branch near the point.

Final answer

-2

Problem 2

Original problem · added worked solution

Find the derivative of the functions in #2 – 5 using only the power rule:​
f(x)=2x3+4x2+3x+1xx

Authored worked explanation for the original source problem.

  1. Divide each numerator term by x: f(x)=2x2+4x+3+x-2.

    Why: This avoids introducing a quotient rule before the next chapter.

  2. Differentiate term by term to get 4x+4-2x-3.

    Why: Use the power rule and the zero derivative of the constant.

Reviewed answer: 4x+4-2x-3, for x≠0.

Takeaway: Algebra can turn a quotient into a sum of powers.

Final answer

4x+4-2x-3, for x≠0.

Problem 3

Original problem · clarified · added worked solution

f(x)=3ex+4x+x

Clarification: Use the exponential derivative rule as well as the power rule.

Authored worked explanation for the original source problem.

Source review note: The source groups this under “using only the power rule,” but e^x requires its special derivative. The source derivative itself is consistent.

  1. Rewrite 4/x=4x-1 and x=x1/2.

    Why: Fractional and negative powers fit the power rule.

  2. Differentiate the three terms to get the answer.

    Why: The exponential term uses d(e^x)/dx=e^x, so the prompt's “only the power rule” instruction cannot literally cover this term.

Reviewed answer: 3ex-4x-2+(1/2)x-1/2, for x>0.

Takeaway: Choose the derivative rule appropriate to each term.

Final answer

3ex-4x-2+(1/2)x-1/2, for x>0.

Problem 4

Original problem · added worked solution

f(x)=secx+tanx(1-sinx)

Authored worked explanation for the original source problem.

Source review note: The source gives sec x tan x−sin x. The printed function simplifies to tan x+cos x, whose derivative is sec²x−sin x.

  1. Use tanx·sinx=sin2x/cosx=secx-cosx.

    Why: Rewrite sin² as 1−cos² to avoid a product rule.

  2. Then f(x)=secx+tanx-(secx-cosx)=tanx+cosx.

    Why: The two secant terms cancel.

  3. Differentiate: f′(x)=sec2x-sinx.

    Why: Use the known tangent and cosine derivatives.

Reviewed answer: sec2x-sinx, where cos x≠0.

Takeaway: Simplification can reveal cancellations before differentiation.

Final answer

sec2x-sinx, where cos x≠0.

Problem 5

Original problem · added worked solution

f(x)=cosx1-cos2x+cosxcotx+sinx

Authored worked explanation for the original source problem.

Source review note: The source derivative also adds 2cos x, but the printed cos x cot x+sin x simplifies to csc x. The first radical equals |sin x|, so the reviewed derivative additionally needs sign cases.

  1. 1-cos2x=|sinx|, so the first term is cosx/|sinx|.

    Why: The nonnegative square root is an absolute value, not automatically sin x.

  2. The remaining terms simplify: cosxcotx+sinx=cos2x/sinx+sinx=cscx.

    Why: Use cos²+sin²=1, with sin x≠0.

  3. On sin x>0, f=cotx+cscx; on sin x<0, f=-cotx+cscx.

    Why: Treat each sign interval separately.

  4. Hence the derivatives are respectively -csc2x-cscxcotx and csc2x-cscxcotx.

    Why: The sign is constant on each interval; differentiate the simplified trig functions.

Reviewed answer: For sin x>0: -csc2x-cscxcotx. For sin x<0: csc2x-cscxcotx.

Takeaway: A square root of a square must keep the absolute value.

Final answer

For sin x>0: -csc2x-cscxcotx. For sin x<0: csc2x-cscxcotx.

Problem 6

Original problem · added worked solution

Carry out three iterations of the Newton-Raphson approximation method for the function f(x)=x3-3x2+3x+3. Use x0= 0.

Authored worked explanation for the original source problem.

  1. f′(x)=3(x-1)2 and xn+1=xn-f(xn)/f′(xn).

    Why: Newton's next guess is the tangent line's x-intercept.

  2. At 0, f=3 and f′=3, so x1=-1; at −1, f=−4 and f′=12, so x2=-2/3.

    Why: Recompute both height and slope at each new guess.

  3. At −2/3, f=-17/27 and f′=25/3, giving x3=-2/3+17/225=-133/225.

    Why: The derivative is nonzero at all three iteration inputs.

Reviewed answer: x1=-1, x2=-2/3, x3=-133/225.

Takeaway: Newton uses the new guess for both function and derivative values.

Final answer

x1=-1, x2=-2/3, x3=-133/225.

Problem 7

Original problem · added worked solution

Carry out two iterations of Newton Raphson approximation, given that:​
f(x)=ln(x),f′(x)=1x​
Use
xo= e

Authored worked explanation for the original source problem.

  1. x1=e-ln(e)/(1/e)=e-e=0.

    Why: The first iteration has a valid positive input.

  2. The next step needs ln(0), which is undefined.

    Why: An iteration must stay in the function's domain to continue.

Reviewed answer: x1=0; the second iteration is undefined.

Takeaway: A legal initial guess can produce an illegal next guess.

Final answer

x1=0; the second iteration is undefined.

Problem 8

Original problem · added worked solution

Calculate the second derivative of the functions in #8 – 10: f(x)=2x3+4x2+3x+1x

Authored worked explanation for the original source problem.

Source review note: The source repeats the sine/cosine answer from problem 9. The printed polynomial/reciprocal function gives 12x+8+2/x³.

  1. The first derivative is 6x2+8x+3-x-2.

    Why: Apply the power rule to every term.

  2. Differentiate once more: 12x+8+2x-3.

    Why: The first derivative's constant disappears and the reciprocal term changes sign again.

Reviewed answer: 12x+8+2x-3, for x≠0.

Takeaway: A second derivative is the derivative of the whole first derivative.

Final answer

12x+8+2x-3, for x≠0.

Problem 9

Original problem · added worked solution

f(x)=sinx-cosx

Authored worked explanation for the original source problem.

  1. f′(x)=cosx+sinx.

    Why: The minus sign on −cos cancels the derivative's minus sign.

  2. f′′(x)=-sinx+cosx.

    Why: Differentiate both first-derivative terms.

Reviewed answer: -sinx+cosx

Takeaway: Track the sign on each trip around the trig derivative cycle.

Final answer

-sinx+cosx

Problem 10

Original problem · added worked solution

f(x)=3ex+x2-1x+1+(4x)3

Authored worked explanation for the original source problem.

Source review note: The source gives 3(e^x+1/√x), but (4√x)³=64x^(3/2), yielding 48/√x in the second derivative. At x=0 the derivatives need separate endpoint treatment.

  1. (x2-1)/(x+1)=x-1 on its original domain, and (4x)3=64x3/2.

    Why: The coefficient 4 must also be cubed.

  2. For x>0, f′=3ex+1+96x.

    Why: The polynomial simplifies before differentiation.

  3. Then f′′=3ex+48/x.

    Why: Differentiate the square root using its fractional power.

Reviewed answer: 3ex+48/x for x>0.

Takeaway: A power applies to the entire parenthesized product.

Final answer

3ex+48/x for x>0.

Problem 11

Added problem and worked solution

Find the derivative of f(x)=5x4-3x2+2x-7.

Authored solution to an added practice problem.

  1. Differentiate 5x4, −3x², 2x, and −7 separately.

    Why: A derivative distributes across sums.

  2. The terms give 20x3, −6x, 2, and 0.

    Why: Multiply each power by its exponent and reduce the exponent by one.

Reviewed answer: 20x3-6x+2

Takeaway: A constant's derivative vanishes.

Final answer

20x3-6x+2

Problem 12

Added problem and worked solution

Differentiate f(x)=1/x+xx for x>0.

Authored solution to an added practice problem.

  1. Rewrite the function as x-1/2+x3/2.

    Why: Square roots and reciprocal roots are powers.

  2. Apply the power rule to both exponents.

    Why: Negative and fractional exponents follow the same algebraic rule on the positive domain.

Reviewed answer: -(1/2)x-3/2+(3/2)x1/2, for x>0.

Takeaway: Choose a form suited to the rule you know.

Final answer

-(1/2)x-3/2+(3/2)x1/2, for x>0.

Problem 13

Added problem and worked solution

Differentiate f(x)=2sinx-3cosx.

Authored solution to an added practice problem.

  1. The derivative of 2sin x is 2cos x.

    Why: Constant multiples pass through differentiation.

  2. The derivative of −3cos x is 3sin x.

    Why: The two negative signs cancel.

Reviewed answer: 2cosx+3sinx

Takeaway: A quick sign check prevents the common cosine error.

Final answer

2cosx+3sinx

Problem 14

Added problem and worked solution

Find f′(x) for f(x)=4ex-tanx, and state its exclusions.

Authored solution to an added practice problem.

  1. Differentiate 4e^x to 4e^x.

    Why: The natural exponential reproduces itself.

  2. Differentiate −tan x to −sec²x.

    Why: Use the tangent derivative on intervals where cosine is nonzero.

Reviewed answer: 4ex-sec2x, with x≠π/2+kπ for any integer k.

Takeaway: The derivative exists only on the original function's domain.

Final answer

4ex-sec2x, with x≠π/2+kπ for any integer k.

Problem 15

Added problem and worked solution

Find the tangent line to y=x3 at x=2.

Authored solution to an added practice problem.

  1. For f(x)=x3, f(2)=8 and f′(2)=3·22=12.

    Why: A tangent line needs a point and an instantaneous slope.

  2. Use point-slope form y-8=12(x-2), then simplify.

    Why: The line must pass through the same point as the curve.

Reviewed answer: y=12x-16.

Takeaway: The derivative supplies the slope, not the line's intercept.

Final answer

y=12x-16.

Problem 16

Added problem and worked solution

Let f(x)=x2 for x≤2 and f(x)=ax+b for x>2. Find a and b so f is differentiable at 2.

Authored solution to an added practice problem.

  1. Continuity at 2 requires 4=2a+b.

    Why: A derivative cannot exist across a jump.

  2. The left derivative is 2x, so its value at 2 is 4; the right derivative is a.

    Why: One-sided slopes must match as well.

  3. Set a=4, then the continuity equation gives b=−4.

    Why: Matching slope alone does not determine the vertical placement.

Reviewed answer: a=4 and b=-4.

Takeaway: A smooth join needs both equal heights and equal slopes.

Final answer

a=4 and b=-4.

Problem 17

Added problem and worked solution

Where is f(x)=|x-3| differentiable, and what is its derivative?

Authored solution to an added practice problem.

  1. For x<3, |x-3|=3-x; for x>3 it is x−3.

    Why: Split according to the sign of the inside expression.

  2. The branch slopes are −1 and 1, so the one-sided slopes disagree at 3.

    Why: A corner prevents a two-sided derivative.

Reviewed answer: Derivative −1 for x<3, +1 for x>3; undefined at 3.

Takeaway: Translate the corner without changing its two slopes.

Final answer

Derivative −1 for x<3, +1 for x>3; undefined at 3.

Problem 18

Added problem and worked solution

Use Newton's method for x2-3=0, starting at x0=2, and compute two iterations.

Authored solution to an added practice problem.

  1. For f(x)=x2-3, use f′=2x and xn+1=xn-(xn2-3)/(2xn).

    Why: The tangent intercept refines the estimate of √3.

  2. From 2, x1=2-1/4=7/4.

    Why: The initial height is 1 and slope is 4.

  3. At 7/4, the height is 1/16 and slope 7/2, so x2=7/4-1/56=97/56.

    Why: Update the slope along with the guess.

Reviewed answer: x1=7/4, x2=97/56≈1.73214.

Takeaway: Keep fractions to avoid accumulated rounding.

Final answer

x1=7/4, x2=97/56≈1.73214.

Problem 19

Added problem and worked solution

Why does Newton's method fail immediately for f(x)=x3-1 with x0=0?

Authored solution to an added practice problem.

  1. f′(x)=3x2, giving zero slope at the proposed initial guess.

    Why: The tangent line is horizontal there.

  2. x1=0-(-1)/0 cannot be computed.

    Why: A horizontal tangent at a nonzero height has no x-intercept.

Reviewed answer: The first step is undefined because f′(0)=0 while f(0)=-1.

Takeaway: Check the denominator before starting Newton's formula.

Final answer

The first step is undefined because f′(0)=0 while f(0)=-1.

Problem 20

Added problem and worked solution

For f(x)=2x3-3x2, find f″ and the intervals of concavity.

Authored solution to an added practice problem.

  1. f′=6x2-6x, then f′′=12x-6.

    Why: Differentiate in two separate passes.

  2. The second derivative is negative below 1/2 and positive above it.

    Why: Its sign describes how the slope changes.

Reviewed answer: f′′(x)=12x-6; concave down for x<1/2 and up for x>1/2.

Takeaway: Concavity concerns changing slopes, not just increasing heights.

Final answer

f′′(x)=12x-6; concave down for x<1/2 and up for x>1/2.

Problem 21

Added problem and worked solution

A position is s(t)=t3-6t2+9t meters, with t in seconds. Find velocity and acceleration, then evaluate both at t=1.

Authored solution to an added practice problem.

  1. Differentiate position s(t)=t3-6t2+9t to get velocity.

    Why: A position rate has units of meters per second.

  2. Differentiate velocity to get acceleration, then substitute t=1.

    Why: Acceleration measures the rate of change of velocity, even at an instant of rest.

Reviewed answer: v(t)=3t2-12t+9 m/s and a(t)=6t-12 m/s²; at 1 s, v=0 and a=−6.

Takeaway: Zero velocity does not imply zero acceleration.

Final answer

v(t)=3t2-12t+9 m/s and a(t)=6t-12 m/s²; at 1 s, v=0 and a=−6.

Problem 22

Added problem and worked solution

Simplify first, then differentiate f(x)=(1+cosx)/sinx-cotx.

Authored solution to an added practice problem.

  1. (1+cosx)/sinx-cotx=1/sinx=cscx.

    Why: The two cos/sin terms cancel without using a quotient rule.

  2. Differentiate the simplified csc x.

    Why: The known special derivative is −csc x cot x.

Reviewed answer: -cscxcotx, where sin x≠0.

Takeaway: A useful simplification can keep the problem within familiar rules.

Final answer

-cscxcotx, where sin x≠0.

Problem 23

Added problem and worked solution

Use the difference quotient to derive f′(a) for f(x)=x2+3x.

Authored solution to an added practice problem.

  1. f(a+h)-f(a)=2ah+h2+3h.

    Why: Expand (a+h)² and cancel identical terms.

  2. Divide by nonzero h to get 2a+h+3, then take h→0.

    Why: The derivative's limit leaves 2a+3.

Reviewed answer: f′(a)=2a+3.

Takeaway: The power rule is consistent with the defining limit.

Final answer

f′(a)=2a+3.

Problem 24

Added problem and worked solution

A derivative table gives f′(a)=2, f′(b)=-1, and f′(c)=0. What can you conclude at these three inputs? Can you declare c a maximum?

Authored solution to an added practice problem.

  1. The table gives f′(a)=2>0 and f′(b)=-1<0.

    Why: These derivative values describe instantaneous tangent slopes; they do not establish monotonicity throughout a neighborhood.

  2. f′(c)=0 means a horizontal tangent, but alone does not classify a maximum or minimum.

    Why: A stationary point can be an extremum or neither.

Reviewed answer: Positive tangent slope 2 at a; negative tangent slope −1 at b; horizontal tangent at c.

Takeaway: A zero derivative needs surrounding information before classification.

Final answer

Positive tangent slope 2 at a; negative tangent slope −1 at b; horizontal tangent at c.

Problem 25

Added problem and worked solution

Use the tangent line at x=4 to estimate 4.1.

Authored solution to an added practice problem.

  1. For f(x)=x, f(4)=2 and f′(4)=1/4.

    Why: Choose a nearby input with an exact value.

  2. The tangent approximation is L(x)=2+(x-4)/4, so L(4.1)=2.025.

    Why: The derivative estimates the small output change from the input change.

Reviewed answer: 4.1≈2.025.

Takeaway: A tangent line provides a local estimate, not an exact value.

Final answer

4.1≈2.025.

Problem 26

Added problem and worked solution

Find the third derivative of f(x)=6ex-sinx.

Authored solution to an added practice problem.

  1. For f=6ex-sinx, f′=6ex-cosx and f′′=6ex+sinx.

    Why: The exponential stays fixed while sine and cosine cycle.

  2. Differentiate once more to get 6ex+cosx.

    Why: Count the number of derivative passes carefully.

Reviewed answer: f′′′(x)=6ex+cosx.

Takeaway: Write intermediate derivatives to track signs and order.

Final answer

f′′′(x)=6ex+cosx.

Problem 27

Added problem and worked solution

Use the difference quotient to examine f(x)=x1/3 at zero.

Authored solution to an added practice problem.

  1. x1/3→0 as x→0, equal to f(0).

    Why: The cube root is continuous on the real line.

  2. At zero the difference quotient is h1/3/h=h-2/3 for nonzero h, which tends to +∞.

    Why: A finite derivative is required for ordinary differentiability.

Reviewed answer: Continuous at 0; no finite derivative there.

Takeaway: An infinite slope is a vertical tangent, not a finite derivative.

Final answer

Continuous at 0; no finite derivative there.

Problem 28

Added problem and worked solution

Show that f(x)=1/x2 is decreasing and concave up on x>0.

Authored solution to an added practice problem.

  1. Write f as x-2, then differentiate twice.

    Why: The power rule handles reciprocal powers.

  2. For positive x, the first derivative is negative and the second positive.

    Why: The graph falls, but its negative slopes become less steep.

Reviewed answer: f′(x)=-2/x3<0 and f′′(x)=6/x4>0 for x>0.

Takeaway: A decreasing graph can be concave up.

Final answer

f′(x)=-2/x3<0 and f′′(x)=6/x4>0 for x>0.

Problem 29

Added problem and worked solution

For f(x)=x3-2x+2, compute two Newton steps from x0=0. What problem do you notice?

Authored solution to an added practice problem.

  1. For f=x3-2x+2, f′=3x2-2. At 0, f=2 and f′=−2, so x₁=1.

    Why: The first tangent intercept moves to 1.

  2. At 1, f=1 and f′=1, so x₂=0.

    Why: The next tangent returns to the starting point.

  3. The same two steps recur, so these guesses do not approach a root.

    Why: Newton's method is an iteration, not a guarantee of convergence.

Reviewed answer: x1=1, x2=0; these guesses repeat.

Takeaway: Valid denominators do not guarantee convergence.

Final answer

x1=1, x2=0; these guesses repeat.

Problem 30

Added problem and worked solution

A student writes d(x-3)/dx=3x-2. Diagnose and fix the error.

Authored solution to an added practice problem.

  1. The exponent is −3, so the coefficient becomes −3 and the new exponent is −4.

    Why: Reducing an exponent means subtracting one, not changing its sign.

  2. Thus d(x-3)/dx=-3x-4, not 3x-2.

    Why: Both the coefficient and exponent in the proposed derivative are wrong.

Reviewed answer: Correct derivative: -3x-4, for x≠0.

Takeaway: The same rule applies to negative exponents.

Final answer

Correct derivative: -3x-4, for x≠0.

Chapter answer key and worked steps

Answers and worked steps for the original problems, including verified corrections where needed.

  1. Original short answer

    -2
    Problem 1 →
  2. Original short answer

    f′(x)=4x+4-2x-3
    Problem 2 →
  3. Checked answer

    3ex-4x-2+(1/2)x-1/2, for x>0.
    Problem 3 →
  4. Corrected answer

    sec2x-sinx, where cos x≠0.
    Problem 4 →
  5. Corrected answer

    For sin x>0: -csc2x-cscxcotx. For sin x<0: csc2x-cscxcotx.
    Problem 5 →
  6. Original short answer

    x1=-1​
    x2=-23​
    x3=-133225
    Problem 6 →
  7. Original short answer

    Undefined, bad initial guess
    Problem 7 →
  8. Corrected answer

    12x+8+2x-3, for x≠0.
    Problem 8 →
  9. Original short answer

    f′′(x)=-sinx+cosx
    Problem 9 →
  10. Corrected answer

    3ex+48/x for x>0.
    Problem 10 →

Read the chapter answer key in the book →

Source worked examples

These are the book’s example problems and worked steps, with the original explanations.

Example Problem 3.1.1

Differentiability →

If it exists, find the derivative at x=1 of the piece-wise function:​
f(x)={x3+1pifx<13x2+12pifx≥1

Motivation: Get ready, because this will likely be one of the most challenging example problems you have encountered so far. So challenging, in fact, that I almost did not want to put this in here. However, if you can learn how to do this problem, you will have mastered the concept behind a derivative. Get set, go!

First check continuity at x = 1, because a discontinuity rules out differentiability. Then compute the left and right difference-quotient limits. If both are finite and equal, the derivative exists. The three visual warning signs discussed earlier are not an exhaustive list.

Step 1: Check for discontinuities by calculating the left hand side and right hand side limits at the point of interest (x = 1)

Conceptually, we would have to test the left hand side limit, then the right hand side limit to see if the function is continuous at the point x = 1.

However, from our mastery of limits, we can see that both of our pieces of functions are positive-degree polynomial functions (all variables have a power greater than or equal to 0), and since these functions are continuous for all real numbers, let’s just plug in the value x=1 for each of these functions to make finding their limits faster.

The left hand side limit at x=1 occurs due to the x3+1 piece of the function. Since we know this is a continuous piece, let’s just plug in x=1 , giving us f(x) = 2 for the left hand side limit.​
The right hand side limit at
x = 1 occurs due to the second piece of the function. By plugging in x = 1 for that piece, we get f(x) = 2 for the right hand side limit.

Recall Theorem 2.1! We just proved that the general limit of this piecewise function not only exists, but is equal to 2 for sure! Also, we proved that this function is continuous because its left hand side and right hand side limits equal each other and because f(1) exists and equals 2 (which disproves the possibility that it might have a hole discontinuity).

Step 2: Check if the function has a cusp at that point

For this piecewise function, compare the finite one-sided derivatives at x = 1. Unequal finite values would give a corner; equal finite values establish differentiability. A cusp usually involves unbounded one-sided slopes, so we should not call every slope mismatch a cusp.

 

Left hand side derivative:

f′(x)=limh→0f(x+h)-f(x)h

This is what we get after plugging in our left-hand side function. Right off the bat, we can see that the constants cancel. We can now expand the term (x+h)3

=limh→0(x+h)3+1-(x3+1)h

=limh→0(x3+3x2h+3xh2+h3)−x3h

The x³ terms cancel. The remaining numerator is 3x²h + 3xh² + h³, so every term has a factor h. For h ≠ 0, cancel that common factor with the denominator, leaving 3x² + 3xh + h² before taking the limit.

=limh→0h(3x2+3xh+h2)h

The h’s cancel! Now we can solve the limit.

=limh→03x2+3xh+h2

=3x2

This is the general left-hand side derivative function. After plugging in x=1, we get that the left hand side derivative equals 3.

Right hand side derivative:

f′(x)=limh→0f(x+h)-f(x)hddd=limh→03(x+h)2+12-3x2+12h

Ew, that looks nasty. Let’s factor out a 12 from the numerator (coefficient law of limits) to make it look nicer and remove some parentheses to see what cancels.

=12limh→03(x+h)2+1-3x2-1h

We see that the constants cancel. Let’s expand the numerator.

=12limh→03x2+6xh+3h2-3x2h

Now the highest order x-terms cancel. Starting to see a pattern here? We can now factor out an h from the numerator and cancel it with the h in the denominator.

=12limh→0h(6x+3h)h​
=12limh→06x+3h​
=3x

Now we plug in x=1 into the derivative function, f’(x) and we get that the right hand side derivative also equals 3!

Whoever designed this problem sure knew what he was doing! The LHS derivative equals the RHS derivative! So there is no cusp!

Step 3: Check for vertical tangents

We have already proven mathematically that there are no vertical tangents at x = 1 because the slope is actually 3, and vertical tangents have a slope of ∞. The gallery on the left shows visually what a piece-wise function looks like without any cusps. It almost looks like the two curves blend very smoothly together and form the graph of a completely new, smooth function.

Return to the original example →

Example Problem 3.2.1

Special Derivatives →

Calculate ddxsinx+cosxsinx⋅cosx

Usually, the first step in these problems is to convert everything into functions of sine and cosine. However, since this problem is already converted, let’s proceed to splitting the numerator and taking the derivative. We can see that another way to write our function is

=ddx(sinxsinx⋅cosx+cosxsinx⋅cosx)

=ddx(secx+cscx)

=secxtanx-cscxcotx

Return to the original example →

Example Problem 3.2.2

Special Derivatives →

Find ddx(cosx+sinxtanx)

Let’s simplify the terms into sin(x) and cos(x)​
=ddx(cosx+sinx⋅sinxcosx)

Now we have two separate terms that we cannot add together because they do not have a common denominator (yet). So let’s make it so that they do have a common denominator.​
=ddx(cos2xcosx+sin2xcosx)

You can probably see where this is going now. After adding the terms and simplifying using our trig identities, we get

=ddxsecx

=sec(x)⋅tan(x)

Return to the original example →

Example Problem 3.3.1

Approximation and Second Derivatives →

Compute two iterations to get a numerical approximation of the root of the function f(x)=x2-2 starting at x = 2.

Let’s write some values that will help solve this problem using the Newton-Raphson Method:

f′(x)=2xf(2)=2f′(2)=4​

 

x2=x1-f(x)f′(x)​
x2=2-24=1.5​
For the next iteration

x3=x2-f(x2)f′(x2)​
Again, we write down values that will help us calculate these quantities:

f(1.5) = 0.25 and f′(1.5) = 3, so the next step is x3=32−143=1712≈1.416667.

That completes the second iteration. The positive root is √2 ≈ 1.414214. Starting at 2, we reached 17/12 ≈ 1.416667, an error of about 0.00245 after two steps. Newton’s method is an approximation method; it does not guarantee success from every starting point.

Return to the original example →

Example Problem 3.4.1

FFR - Derivative Concepts →

Prove using the Mean Value Theorem that the derivative of ln(x) is equal to 0.582 somewhere between the points 1 and e.

Let’s plug in values of 1 and e into the function ln(x). We know that ln(1) is 0 and ln(e) = 1. What is the slope of the secant line going through these two points (1, 0) and (e, 1)?

Let’s just use some Algebra 2 to figure this out.slope=1-0e-1

1e-1=0.582

Now we know that the slope of the secant line is 0.582. Therefore, the MVT tells us that there exists a point between 1 and e whose tangent line has the same slope of 0.582. We have just proven what the question asked.

This graph of sin(x) is green when concave down and blue when concave up. The empty spots are inflection points.

Read all original image captions

Image 1

This graph of sin(x) is green when concave down and blue when concave up. The empty spots are inflection points.

Image 2

This graph depicts Rolle’s Theorem in action. The graph has two zeros, and sure enough, there is one point between them when the derivative equals zero. Extending this theorem to non-zero values gives us the Mean Value Theorem (MVT), shown next.

Image 3

This is a demonstration of the Mean Value Theorem (MVT) showing that there exists a point c between a and b where the slope of the secant line going through a and b is equal to the derivative at c.

Return to the original example →

Search lessons, terms and problems