Access this content offline
Omniguides
Skip to the reading

3.2 Sampling Distributions for Sample Proportions — Answers and Rubrics

These solutions explain the new practice tasks in this lesson. For simulation parts, a valid recorded run may differ from another learner’s run; the rubric checks the model, recorded work and interpretation.

Original generated practice for the Fall 2026 course. Return to the lesson and independent checks.

Repeated Library Proportions: worked answer

A city library has 20,000 registered members. Complete membership records establish that exactly 40% renewed online this year, so the population proportion is known to be p=0.40. Select an SRS of 200 distinct members without replacement. Independently repeat this whole sampling procedure when discussing its sampling distribution. One actual sample happens to contain 79 online renewals. Use the usual 10% approximation and, where justified, the normal approximation without a continuity correction.

Part a

Calculate the mean and standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the online-renewal sample proportion. Show the formula and substitution. Calculate the observed sample proportion from 79 renewals, and explain why it does not replace the known p in your theoretical mean or SD.

μp^=p=0.40\mu_{\hat p}=p=0.40. σp^≈0.40(0.60)/200=0.0012=0.034641\sigma_{\hat p}\approx\sqrt{0.40(0.60)/200}=\sqrt{0.0012}=0.034641, about 3.46 percentage points. The approximation uses the small sampling fraction. The actual statistic is 79/200=0.39579/200=0.395; it varies from sample to sample, whereas the complete records establish the fixed population p=0.40.

Part a scoring criteria
Evidence for creditPoints
Uses known p=0.40 to obtain mean 0.40.1
Substitutes into the square-root formula and obtains SD 0.034641 in proportion units.1
Calculates 0.395 and explains why an observed statistic does not become the population parameter.1

Return to this independent task

Part b

Justify whether this sample design and a normal model for its sample proportion are appropriate. Address randomization, the without-replacement 10% condition with N and n, and both expected-success and expected-failure counts. Explain what the 10% condition approximates.

The SRS is random. Since 200≤0.10(20,000)=2,000200\leq 0.10(20{,}000)=2{,}000, the sampling fraction is small enough for the usual independence approximation; without-replacement observations are not literally independent. Expected counts are np=200(0.40)=80np=200(0.40)=80 members who renewed online and n(1−p)=200(0.60)=120n(1-p)=200(0.60)=120 members who did not renew online, both at least 10. Thus an approximately normal sampling distribution is appropriate under the stated model.

Part b scoring criteria
Evidence for creditPoints
Identifies the SRS as random.1
Verifies 200≤2,000 with the correct population and explains approximate independence.1
Computes 80 and 120 and explicitly checks both against 10.1
Links the satisfied conditions to a justified approximate normal model.1

Return to this independent task

Part c

Evaluate three alternative designs separately: (i) an SRS of 3,000 from the same 20,000 members; (ii) an SRS of 200 for a different known category with p=0.02; (iii) 200 responses to a voluntary website poll. Identify each failed condition with a calculation or design reason. Would an independently generated with-replacement sample require the 10% check? Explain.

(i) 3,000>2,0003{,}000>2{,}000, so the usual no-finite-population-correction SD approximation is unsupported. (ii) Expected counts are 4 and 196; 4<10 fails the success-count normality condition. (iii) A voluntary poll has no random selection, so the SRS sampling model is unsupported even if its counts are large. Independent with-replacement draws do not create the without-replacement dependence, so that 10% check is unnecessary; the expected-count check is still needed for a normal sample-proportion model.

Part c scoring criteria
Evidence for creditPoints
Identifies the 3,000/20,000 sampling-fraction failure.1
Calculates 4 expected successes and 196 failures and identifies the failing count.1
Rejects voluntary selection as random sampling.1
Explains why the without-replacement 10% condition is not needed for independent replacement draws.1

Return to this independent task

Part d

Estimate P(p^≥0.45)P(\hat p\geq 0.45) for the original SRS of 200 using your justified normal model. Show the standardized cutoff and area direction. Interpret the distribution mean, its SD and this probability in the library context, with the repeated sample size explicit.

z=(0.45−0.40)/0.034641=1.44338z=(0.45-0.40)/0.034641=1.44338. The upper-tail normal area is about 1−Φ(1.44338)=0.074461-\Phi(1.44338)=0.07446. Across repeated SRSs of 200 members, the average sample online-renewal proportion is 0.40 and the typical deviation from 0.40 is about 0.03464, or 3.46 percentage points. About 7.45% of those size-200 samples would have an online-renewal proportion at least 0.45 under this approximate model. It is a probability for whole-sample proportions, not for one member.

Part d scoring criteria
Evidence for creditPoints
Uses cutoff z≈1.44338 and the upper tail to obtain about 0.07446.1
Interprets the mean as the repeated size-200 proportion average.1
Interprets SD as about 3.46 percentage points of sample-proportion variability.1
Interprets the probability for whole repeated SRSs of 200 from the stated population.1

Return to this independent task

Search lessons, terms and problems