Access this content offline
Omniguides
Skip to the reading

Random Sampling: Identify and Justify the Method — Worked Solutions

Worked Solutions

Compare your reasoning with the worked solutions after attempting the questions. A different valid representation or explanation can earn credit when it satisfies the stated criteria.

Original generated practice for the Fall 2026 course. Return to the lesson and independent checks.

What happens after a draw?: worked answer

A researcher draws an apartment number from a box. Procedure A sets the slip aside. Procedure B returns and remixes the slip before each next draw.

Part a

Identify each replacement rule and explain whether the same apartment can be selected again.

A is without replacement: the selected slip is not returned, so that apartment cannot be drawn again. B is with replacement: the slip returns before later draws, so the apartment may be selected multiple times.

Part a scoring criteria
Evidence for creditPoints
Identifies both rules.1
Connects return/set-aside operation to reselection possibility.1

Return to this independent task

Equal combinations: worked answer

Ten students have labels 01–10. Method A uses a random-number generator to choose two distinct labels uniformly from all pairs. Method B flips a coin and selects either students 01/02 or students 09/10.

Part a

Identify which method is an SRS of size 2 and explain using possible samples. Give an equivalent numbered-slip procedure.

A is an SRS because every two-student pair has the same chance. B permits only two pairs and leaves other pairs impossible, so it is not an SRS. Mix ten equal numbered slips and draw two without replacement for an equivalent SRS.

Part a scoring criteria
Evidence for creditPoints
Uses equal chances of all size-2 samples.1
Rejects restricted pairs and gives valid slip procedure.1

Return to this independent task

Which groups are sampled?: worked answer

A school divides students into grades and samples 15 students randomly from each grade. A different school randomly chooses four mixed-grade homerooms and measures every student in those homerooms.

Part a

Identify the two methods. Explain the grouping characteristic and which units are measured in each.

The first is stratified random sampling: non-overlapping grade strata group students by a shared attribute, an SRS is taken from each, and results are combined. The second is cluster random sampling: whole homerooms are randomly selected and all their students measured. Ideally mixed homerooms reflect school variety and are similar to one another.

Part a scoring criteria
Evidence for creditPoints
Correct names and stratum similarity/all-strata sample.1
Cluster selection and all selected-cluster units.1
Describes desired cluster heterogeneity/similarity.1

Return to this independent task

The starting point matters: worked answer

A list contains 500 households. An interviewer randomly selects a start from 1–10, then selects that position and every tenth position.

Part a

Identify the method and its two essential selection features. Explain a concern if every tenth list entry has a special characteristic.

This is systematic random sampling. It combines a random starting point with a fixed interval of 10 between selections. A repeating list pattern at interval 10 could make every selected household share a characteristic, so suitability depends on the order.

Part a scoring criteria
Evidence for creditPoints
Names systematic random and both features.1
Explains an ordering-specific appropriateness concern.1

Return to this independent task

Choose a museum survey: worked answer

A museum has 600 annual members: 200 family, 250 individual, and 150 student memberships. The roster has a unique label for each member. It also lists 30 neighborhood groups of 20 members each. Every neighborhood group contains a varied mix of membership categories. Each neighborhood group has approximately the same family/individual/student proportions as the overall membership. The museum wants to compare opening-time preferences by membership category and can obtain 60 responses.

Part a

Identify and describe a size-60 SRS procedure. Explain the equal-sample condition, and state whether you would sample with or without replacement.

Use the complete 600-member roster and a random-number generator to select 60 distinct labels uniformly without replacement. Every possible set of 60 members must have the same chance, not merely every member an equal individual chance. Without replacement avoids asking one member multiple times.

Part a scoring criteria
Evidence for creditPoints
Complete roster, chance rule, and 60 distinct labels.1
Equal probability of all size-60 sets and correct replacement rationale.1

Return to this independent task

Part b

Identify a stratified random method using the three membership categories. Give one valid allocation totaling 60 and explain how the sample is assembled.

Use family, individual, and student categories as non-overlapping strata. One allocation is 20 random members from each category; proportionate 20,25,15 is also valid. Select an SRS within every stratum and combine the chosen members into one sample. Membership type is the shared within-stratum attribute.

Part b scoring criteria
Evidence for creditPoints
Non-overlapping strata/shared attribute.1
SRS from every category, valid total, and combination.1

Return to this independent task

Part c

Identify a cluster method that yields 60 measured members. Explain why the group descriptions are desirable for this method.

Select an SRS of three of the 30 neighborhood groups, then measure all 20 members in each selected group. The groups are desirable clusters because each reflects varied membership types and the groups are similar to one another. Do not randomly select only some members inside these clusters and still call it this one-stage method.

Part c scoring criteria
Evidence for creditPoints
Random selection of three groups and all 60 members.1
Explains population variety within and similarity between clusters.1

Return to this independent task

Part d

Identify a systematic random method of size 60 from the ordered 600-member roster. Specify the random start and interval.

Choose the starting position uniformly from 1 through 10, then take that position and every tenth position through the list. This yields 60 selections. Both the random start and interval 10 are part of the method.

Part d scoring criteria
Evidence for creditPoints
Start randomly selected from 1–10.1
Every tenth position and size 60.1

Return to this independent task

Part e

Justify a choice for comparing membership categories. Explain a different circumstance in which cluster sampling could be preferable.

Stratifying by category ensures all categories supply observations and can ensure enough student-member responses for comparisons; an equal allocation prioritizes such comparisons. Cluster sampling might be preferable if interviewers must visit neighborhoods and measuring every selected group reduces travel. The choice depends on comparison needs and collection cost, not a universal ranking.

Part e scoring criteria
Evidence for creditPoints
Connects strata to category comparisons.1
Connects clusters to group collection cost with an explicit circumstance.1

Return to this independent task

Part f

If the museum used replacement for repeated draws of member labels, what would change after each draw and what would become possible?

Return the selected label to the selection pool before the next draw. A member could be selected more than once. That is different from the distinct-label without-replacement procedures above.

Part f scoring criteria
Evidence for creditPoints
Return before subsequent draw.1
Possible repeated selection with comparison to distinct labels.1

Return to this independent task

Search lessons, terms and problems